![]() ![]() Simple, in the case of Fratres, means pure, elegant, perfect. This makes Fratres amazing, for the same reasons that a mathematician may consider a brief, elegant formula much more beautiful than a complex formula. Nevertheless, the sequence of notes can be described by a comparatively simple formula, as I've described in the analysis.įratres: Fur Alina: Fur Lennart In Memoriam: Hymn to a Great City (1984) I Am the True Vine (1996) Kanon Pokajanen part I: Kanon Pokajanen part II: Lamentate: Litany for soli (alto/countertenor, 2 tenors, bass,mixed choir and orchestra: Littlemore tractus (2000), in the words of John Henry Newman (from the sermon Wisdom and Innocence, read in. By no means do I consider Fratres trivial or hollow. Anonymous The word 'simple' has many connotations. But when I looked it up on Wiki the text citing your analysis seemed a little dismissive of the piece where it says: 'The chord sequences themselves follow a clear pattern, and while the progressing chords explore a rich harmonic space, they nevertheless appear to have been generated by means of a simple mathematical formula.' Were you saying that the piece is somehow simple or mechanically created? Just wondering, your thoughts appreciated. I am completely amazed by Fratres and am listening to all the versions on my online music service as the piece is new to me. ![]() Were you saying that the piece is somehow simple or mechanically created? Just wondering, your thoughts appreciated. ![]() But when I looked it up on Wiki the text citing your analysis seemed a little dismissive of the piece where it says: 'The chord sequences themselves follow a clear pattern, and while the progressing chords explore a rich harmonic space, they nevertheless appear to have been generated by means of a simple mathematical formula.' ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |